Erin Andrews Got A Gatorade Bath

By The Way, It Was Blue

Joe Flacco Has Rap Tribute

Yep, He Does!

Dwayne Wade's Full Court Assist To Lebron

Holy......

Girl Creates Music Video For Tim Tebow

C'Mon Tim...She's Wearing Hipster Clothes

Monkey Riding Dog Is Halftime Entertainment

Ride Him Monkey!

March 31, 2009

Today's Moment of Zen: New York Lottery, it could happen



In today's Moment of Zen, there are probably some instances when you have bought a lottery ticket and thought what would I do with it.

Well, this commercials from the New York Lottery has a twist ending about a struggling baseball player.

I hope this does not give Mark Cuban any ideas.

By Ben Chew with No comments

Remembering Alonzo Mourning



One of the stories that I have been keeping my eye on is the Miami Heat honoring Alonzo Mourning by retiring his number 33.

Alonzo Mourning was one of the greatest shot-blockers in NBA history. (He is currently listed as 11th all-time in NBA history in block shots with 2,356)

Mourning started his collegiate career at Georgetown where he was coached by legend John Thompson. He led the nation in block-shots as a freshman and was named three times an All-American.

Alonzo was drafted in the 1992 NBA draft with the second overall pick by the Charlotte Hornets. He along with Larry Johnson and Muggsy Bogues brought some showtime to basketball in Charlotte and his buzzer-beater to beat Boston ranks among the best in NBA playoff history.



Mourning eventually joined the Miami Heat in a trade back in 1997. This eventually paired him up with Tim Hardaway and the Heat had many memorable runs in the playoffs, specifically against the New York Knicks. However Mourning and the Heat never turned the corner and it appeared that Mourning would go without his elusive championship.

Then it turned worst when Mourning in 2000 was diagnosed with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. This kidney-disease eventually forced him into retirement in 2003and it appeared that this would be the sad end to Mourning career.

Well, things got better for Mourning when he received a kidney transplant in 2003 and was back playing in a diminshed role with the New Jersey Nets in 2004. However, Mourning wanted to be back in Miami and eventually he found his way back in 2005.

In 2006, he teamed with Shaquille O'Neal and Dwayne Wade to bring an NBA title to Miami. Many people credit Mourning for his defensive intensity in the series and Mourning made plays that could shifted the momentum for either team.

Mourning eventually retired for good in 2009 as the Heat's all-time leading scorer and the only Heat player to have his number retired.

Congratulations to Alonzo for his spectular career and his giant heart.

By Ben Chew with No comments

March 30, 2009

I Love the Internet: Goal Line Blitz

So we don't normally do this, but I want to recommend this crazy addicting MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game) to our readers called Goal Line Blitz. To be clear, we don't actually have any formal connection to these guys, I'm just a person who thinks it's a crazy fun game and thus wants to use the blog space to name drop it.

After you create an account, the site prompts you to pick a position that your created football player will play in the game. Give him a name, pick his starting attributes, and you're off. He (or she I guess) automatically joins a computer team and plays preseason and regular season and playoff games. Well not really play, as the games are simulated and your players just play as well as the stats they have are. But you can watch the simulated games of different colored dots play by play. The real "game" aspect is that there is no perfect way to distribute your "training points" and "flex points," and so you either be okay at the game and make your player very good or you can be awesome at it and make a superstar. My only character (you can have as many players as you have "flex points" to make but I prefer focusing on one guy) is a level 33 punter (I'm SpastikMooss there too), and a pretty damn good one at that. Good enough to recently bring about a three team bidding war for his services resulting in a sweet bonus of 50,000, which I bought some pink cleats with (nice).

Anyways, pretty fun little game if you like online MMORPGs at all. It's the only one I've really ever gotten addicted to other than Urban Dead, and even that got boring after my guy got too powerful. So check it out if you think you should, and maybe I'll see you in the playoffs.

By SpastikMooss with No comments

Gotta Love a Gimmick - Phil Collins versus the Ultimate Warrior

This is one of the most absurd things I've ever seen. Used in 1990 as a skit during a Phil Collins TV special, this video has Gilbert Gottfried, Vanessa Williams and some other actor trying to come up with a gimmick. Gottfriend exclaims "Phil Collins versus the Ultimate Warrior" and what follows is pure magic.

To be fair, although Collins gets destroyed, he doesn't technically lose the match.

By SpastikMooss with No comments

The NBA: Where Fan Sniping Happens



The NBA finals are still two months off, and I wouldn't bet on a Lakers-Celtics rematch with the way the Cavs have been playing, but everyday is an opportunity for Lakers and Celtics fans to take shots at each other. When we're lucky, these shots take creative turns, and today we're lucky. In response to a Lakers fan's Paul Pierce parody, a Celts fan got up a Sasha Vujacic parody. Cheers.



(courtesy of Skeets' twitter account)

By snagamat with No comments

Epochrypha: Era-ta

Since I'm on an off week for Epochrypha, and seeing as my soupe du jour or, rather, soupe de la saison (i.e. the NBA) isn't top news right now, I figured it'd be a good time serve up the first helping of Era-ta, which will taste pretty much like the bi-weekly but be a little less meaty (cf. clam chowder vs. corn chowder). For now, Great Sports Names, some guy named Tiger, and a little Madness may thicken the air, but in a week or two you're going to want to turn your attention back to the only league that insists on calling itself an association. The following tidbits won't make you more knowledgeable come NBA postseason, they won't help you win any sports bar arguments with your buddies, but it should keep your appetite whetted and keep you feeling superior to your boxscore billeted "peers". So tuck your bibs in boys and girls and get that saliva going. Here we go.
  • So, last Epochrypha, I talked about parity as probably good for ratings, and fan excitement, and etc. I also talked about polarity being better for narrative creation (incidentally, case study: Kobe). Whatever. Who cares. People who care say 32 to 50 wins make an average, and if you look at the East it's actually quite paritous (to borrow a page from the Shaqtus book of spelling). The West, however, is a mess, mostly because six or seven teams are projected to win more than 50 games and nearly the same amount are projected to win less than 30. Yawn. But here's the wake-up call. The Toronto Raptors look to fall just outside that paritous zone. Makes sense when you look at their season, but not when you look at a game like Sunday night's. Bosh puts up 31 and 15 and Calderon dished out 19 to push them over the right at .500 Bulls. With stars who can perform like that, you gotta think they do well, but they don't. Similarly, look at the New Jersey Nets. By all accounts, Vince Carter and Devin Harris are having excellent years, and Brook Lopez is showing himself as a solid contributor, if not more. They're well within the paritous zone but fairly far from the playoffs at this point. Sure their bench sucks, but with feel good stories like that you'd think they'd be a little closer to pushing the woeful Pistons from the postseason. Then, look at the top of the standings in the East. Three teams projecting into the 60-win range. Cleveland, sure. But Boston hasn't had the season people expected by any stretch of the imagination. Still, 60-ish wins. And Orlando? Maybe Dwight's stepped up his game. But Lewis and Turkoglu haven't had significantly better seasons than they did last year. And Jameer Nelson went out after a game over half a season. How is that a 60 win team? What I'm getting at is the impropriety of perception. Feel good stories don't mean squat at the end of the season. They might be good for the pundits and bloggers, or the casual fans, but they don't get you to the postseason. No, what does that is mid-season streaks and "no news is good news" style of ball. See: Spurs (Yawn).
  • Hate to keep beating a dead horse, but people keep writing about my idea and not giving me credit. Following that link, you'll find a Marc Stein piece on what this year's playoffs would like if the division winners could select their first round opponents. It's good to see the idea extended and applied like that. What I find intriguing is actually all the stories you'd get from teams' internal bickering over which opponent to choose. You can just imagine Dwight Howard telling the press that he'd have picked Detroit if he had the choice, even though it'd probably be a bad basketball decision. It'd be another chance to see the star egos at play, which is always fun.
  • Stein's been doing a bunch of foward-looking thinking (and I'm not talking about drooling over Blake Griffin), which is commendable. He gives quite a full FAQ about the possibility of a lockout, so if you want to be knowledgeable about the party after the after-party, you can check that out. What interests me more, however, is the quiet mention that Stern's going to propose the pick-your-poison playoff scheme to the NBA's shrouded-in-mist "competition committee." This really intrigues me, because I've heard this semi-governing body bandied about the blogosphere a bit, but I have absolutely no idea what it is. Who's on it? Does it simply entail Stern going back to his boudoir (don't ask me why all the French), sticking ideas on a dart board, and playing pop the balloon? Okay, a hot second of poking around reminds that the competition committee led the decision to make the perimeter a wing's feeding frenzy. And it's headed by Jerry Colangelo, who is responsible for both the national Redeem Team and, partially, the Phoenix incarnation. Also, the NFL has a competition committee. Still, no other period in sports would produce such a method of getting things done. So maybe there were groups of guys who made the decisions about how games should look before, but they never needed to be referred to as some kind of shadowy recourse for all the tough questions put to the commissioner.
  • Maybe I was wrong to quote the Kobster on this twitter stuff. I mean why look to the guys who are abstaining to tell you how good the forbidden fruit is? I criticized the breaking of the fourth wall for making athletes all the more unreachable and distant, making their presentable facade leak in to their actual lives, which is sad. However, who's the king of all this? The Big Antithesis (to Kobe), of course. And how does the Diesel do it? By being more real than we've ever seen a star athlete be. Sure, his actions remind more of a 20 year old than a 37 year old. Still, we can't discount how refreshing it is to see an athlete frequenting normal places, like a diner or department store. Also, it's pleasantly revealing to know he can't sleep sometimes, just like most people, and to see the hilariously mundane photos he takes when insomnia strikes.
  • Louis Amundson, he of recent Stepping Up fame, apparently called Nene a "dirty player" and "fake tough guy." Accusations of dirty have been flying all over the league this year. But I love Nene's response. He calls Amundson a "stupid dude" and says, "That was no head butt. That is nothing ... If I do a head butt, I break all of his face. That was nothing.'' He also says George Karl talks to him about control, but what he's really trying to work on is patience. Me? I'm patiently waiting for all this dirty talk to hit the competition committee fan.

By snagamat with No comments

Today's Moment of Zen: Guitar Hero, NCAA Coaches Edition



In today's Moment of Zen, the final four of the NCAA tournament has already been set. However Guitar Hero: Metallica has decided to use NCAA basketball coaching legends: Bob Knight, Roy Williams, Coach K, and Rick Pitino in their latest commercial.

I actually think it is a pretty good commercial especially with the ending with Bob Knight. However I have some sinking feeling that Heidi Klum's was better. "Auf Wiedersehen, Mr. Knight."



(Courtesy of Awful Announcing, check there for bonus outakes for the NCAA one)

By Ben Chew with No comments

March 28, 2009

Scottie Reynolds dashes the hopes of another "All Chalk" bracket



Remember that below post about the past couple days of the boredom of March Madness. Well, finally we got a solid taste of it with the Villanova Wildcats upsetting the Pittsburgh Panthers on a shot by guard Scottie Reynolds, 78-76.

I guess you really cannot call it an upset since they beat Pittsburgh by ten in the regular season. (I still have a bone to pick with the selection commitee over Pittsburgh getting a number one seed.)

Also, I still cannot figure out how Reynolds could pretty much go uncontested to the basket but that is just a testament to how good he is. Pittsburgh head coach Jamie Dixon will still be wondering about why DeJuan Blair for going for a steal and about LeVance Fields for pretty much guarding air on that possession.

Pittsburgh appeared to be heading for overtime when a costly inbounds pass by Villanova led to two free throws for Pittsburgh guard LeVance Fields.

However, Villanova came back off of a well designed inbounds play that had shades of Bryce Drew and Valpo, all over again. Villanova moves onto the Final Four for the first time since 1985. It's a good year for "Wildcats", huh?

By Ben Chew with No comments

Today's Moment of Zen: Finally, March Madness is exciting



In today's Moment of Zen, the last two nights of the NCAA Divison one tournament was rather boring with three blowouts and Michigan State stealing one against the defending champion Kansas Jayhawks.

However, the Divison II championship put some excitement back into March with a buzzer beating three pointer by Findlay to win by the score of 56-53 in overtime.

Findlay went 36-0 on the year with the victory. I guess you can be perfect in college basketball after all. Well, if you are in division two at least.

(Courtesy of Awful Announcing)

By Ben Chew with No comments

Gotta Love a Gimmick - WCW Meets...Robocop?

Yeah, it makes about as much sense to me as it does to you. But in another 90's ratings prayer, WCW hyped the arrival of Robocop at a Pay per View Event. He shows up, walks down the ramp to "rescue" Sting from a "steel" cage by "tearing" the door off, and then walks away with Sting. And then never appeared again. Okayyyy...

By SpastikMooss with No comments

March 27, 2009

The Day Terry Glenn Made Regis Philbin Look Like a Fool

The Year is 1995. The Game is Ohio State-Notre Dame. Ohio State has never beaten Notre Dame and is only up by 1 with the ball on their own 18 on third down. Regis Philbin, an ND alum tells ABC reporter Lynn Swann that Notre Dame is going to win.

And then Terry Glenn turns a short curl pass into an 82 yard catch and run touchdown, outrunning future kick returner extraordinaire Allen Rossum in the process.

OSU went on to beat the Irish 42-26, Terry Glenn proved what he could do when he wasn't being a little girl, and Regis pulled a Matt Hasslebeck with his statement. Got to love those three outcomes.

By SpastikMooss with No comments

Charles Rogers Headed to 15 Days of Jail

Remember Charles Rogers? The ex Detroit Lion #2 overall pick of the 2003 draft? The guy who caught 2 TD passes in his debut only to break his collarbone later in the same game to knock him out for the year. The guy who then broke his collarbone again in the season debut the following year? And then battled injuries in the 2005 season, played 9 games, failed a drug test, and was done with the Lions?

Rogers was put into an extensive drug counseling program following a domestic dispute a while ago. The program included daily drug tests, nine months of searching his home for drugs whenever they wanted, and nine months of probation. First part went well, second less so, as it turned out Rogers both failed a sobriety test and was found to have faked going to AA meetings. For shame. The result? 30 days in jail, with credit for 15 days served.

Rogers' thoughts on the matter: “I’m just going to do my 10 days, get out of the court system and try to get in shape for a comeback. Am I sad about the way my life has turned out? No, because I know the strides I’ve made to take care of Charles Rogers.” He continues “Who knows? Maybe we’ll be talking in a year about me playing football again. It’s not like I’m 35. I’m only 27 with fresh legs and a lot of life and football ahead of me.”

Comeback sounds less than sure at this point, as he had some talent, but probably not nearly enough to bring him back. Then again, would you rather take a chance on a potentially hugely talented but also hugely troubled guy like Adam Jones, or a lesser felon/lesser talented guy like Rogers. To each their own, but I'd rather take my chances on the huge talent, not the guy with size who lost his speed and strength.

By SpastikMooss with No comments

FIELD TRIP! - Eddie George's Grille 27 in Columbus, OH

In keeping with the sites name, we're going waaaay Outside the Boxscore tonight and giving you a taste of Eddie George's Grille 27. I have a friend in Columbus, OH who I visit now and then. Everytime I visit we walk past Eddie's place on the corner of 11th and High Street, but I hadn't ever been in, until yesterday's lovely dinner there. Having finally experienced the dining experience that is Eddie George's, I'll share my opinions with you!

To begin, I want to quell some misconceptions about Eddie George's. From the street and on its website, the place looks pretty fancy. Inside 27, however, the place isn't nearly as sophisticated. It's certainly clean and looks nice, and the waitstaff is dressed nice, but there are tvs everywhere (the booths even get their own little flatscreens) and the menus are more of the cheap takeout variety. A friend of my friend said this was the kind of spot you took girlfriends to, but when Eddie talks in the video about how families can eat there he is much more correct. I'm sure a huge Buckeye loving girlfriend would enjoy Eddie's, but I'd probably take her somewhere a little fancier. Regardless, just wanted to point that out for diners in the Columbus area who stay away fearing a sophisticated/high class place. Eddie's is actually a very comfortable, affordable dining experience.

The waitstaff was lovely and the food was...interesting. Lots of choices, though mostly sandwiches/salads. I was actually kind of shocked to only see 3 different cuts of steak in a football town. Of course one of them was a $44 dollar 27 ounce steak, in honor of #27 himself, which is supposed to be delicious, and so I guess that can count as a few different steaks. I really wanted to get the 27 ounce, but being a poor recent college graduate, it was sadly a little out of my price range. I also didn't get any booze, though I hear they make amazing martinis, so I regret that one, as they were affordable.

Instead, I opted for something truly...innovative? A fried meatloaf hoagie, with literally everything fried. I know the Midwest is all about frying their food but wow, I did not realize that included the bread and the meatloaf and the sauce and all. My friend got a wrap (I forget the type), which looked pretty good. The fries on the side were delicious, the hoagie was alright (some things are delicious fried, meatloaf is not really one of those things). Additionally, my friend seemed to really enjoy her wrap.

Dessert was definitely considered, but ultimately we had none. Which was a shame, as they had a fried chocolate dessert. I've had fried ice cream and I've had fried twinkies but this thing appeared to take the cake (literally). My mouth still waters thinking about the possibilities of it.

Good food, good service, and it was kind of cool to watch the 2007 homerun derby in a nice restauraunt that wasn't a chain like TGI Fridays or Chili's. The portions are solid, and we each paid under $10 for our meals, so the prices were solid as well.

So my thoughts? If you go in expecting a fancy steakhouse, or a house of memorabilia, then you will be sadly dissapointed. However, if you go in expecting good food at a good price (and little reminder of the owner himself besides the number 27 on the menus and walls), then you'll be pleasantly suprised with Eddie George's. For a start to the night, or as a night cap after a long night of drinking at the Ugly Tuna and McFadden's, Eddie George's Grille is perfect. So well done Mr. Buckeye, decent establishment.

And there you have my visit to Eddie George's Grille 27. I hope you'll try it if you're in town!

By SpastikMooss with No comments

March 26, 2009

Anna Kournikova Plays Beer Pong


Frat boys (and sportswriters) everywhere are drooling over the thought of Anna K, in that dress, playing an intimate game of beer pong with the guys (maybe some kind of future promo deal?). The images have been getting some decent blog play, and who wouldn't link to the dream of Kournikova's legs and one superfluous screen shot of the pong table, no legs (?).

However, the footage reveals that beer pong as we know it may forever be changed if college guys want to claim this new fantasy of playing beer pong with Anna. Seems like, because of TV time constraints, Fallon didn't make Kournikova go all the way down to the last cup. Furthermore, though Fallon was drinking "Bud Light Lime", Anna was doing Barq's. This begs the question: which is girlier, light beer with a twist or root beer?

By snagamat with 3 comments

Gotta Love a Gimmick - The Yeti

WCW tried, for a long time, to be as popular as the WWF was.

Bringing former WWF wrestlers like Hulk Hogan, Randy Savage, Lex Luger, and Paul Wight over was a good decision.

Establishing a new nearly 8 foot tall Yeti (mummy) character whose first appearance includes dry humping them champion Hulk Hogan (the real 'action' begins at 0:32) was not such a good decision.

Bonus: The birth of the Yeti.

By SpastikMooss with No comments

Stepping Up: Louis Amundson

Stepping Up is big games from little guys. Big meaning important though the boxscore might not show it. Little meaning lack of household-name-ness. Recognize.

So I wrote that piece last month about how the Suns are the real Redeem Team, with nary a mention of Louis Amundson. I also missed Stromile Stiff, but hey he was nominally a Net at the time. Lot to rave about with the Suns' efforts of late, but nothing so significant as the contributions of Looooooouuuu!!!! I love it when fans cheer these "oo" names, because it sounds like boos are raining down from on high, but actually it's home teams rooting for these specially named players. Okay, okay, but the Suns. You can say Shaq's doing well, Hill's doing great, Nash is passing Mo Cheeks for assist records, even Richardson's playing that heady brand. The Suns are rolling at the right time, and all this without STAT and or much Leandrinho. How are they doing this? All signs point to Amundson.

Who is Louis Amundson? He was undrafted out of UNLV (where he graduated cum laude in Philosophy) and spent some time in the D-League, where he won All-league honors and was the 06-07 rookie of the year. He played a combined 153 minutes of NBA ball before this season, but was signed to two year by Phoenix and stepped right in when Amar'e's retina went all haywire. Arizona Republic's Paul Coro drops this beaut of line about Amundson: "he brings life to a game's flat spots like rain on the desert," and from what I'm seeing, the people in Phoenix are drinking that lucid eye-juice (well, everyone but Amar'e...sorry). More on their lucidity in a bit, but more on Lou now. Not only does he ride a bike to home games, but he also has one of the more natural looks in the whole long NBA hair trend. Jerry Sloan made Amundson cut the locks to sign two ten-day contracts with the Jazz a few years back. Guess Sloan got his back Wednesday night.

Lou is a chill dude, playing guitar and getting his downward-facing dog on in his off time. But he gets his rotweiler on when that tip goes up. His Wikipedia page claims he recorded more than 4 blocks per minute at one point, though I can't find anything to substantiate that. I did see the twelve blocks Phoenix put up Wednesday night, as well as the key rejections Amundson hit the Jazz up for. Looking at him, you'd see more Mike Miller than Deke. Still, he gets under dudes skin. Earlier this season, he irked Zack Randolph so much that Z-bo threw a two-game suspending punch. Then, The Nuggets' Nene also received a two-game suspension for head-butting and elbowing Amundson to the floor this Monday in a Suns win. All I can say is, if Amundson is heading for a career along the lines of Kurt Rambis and Rudy Tomjonovich, then he's not doing half bad. Was that inappropriate? Sorry. Keep up the good work, Lou. Here's lookin at you (kid)!

Now on to that lucid water they're drinking in Phoenix. It's no secret that no matter what kind of tear the Suns go on, their playoff hopes are contigent on the Dallas Mavericks' missing a step or two in the next few weeks. They've got a big showdown this coming Sunday. The Suns already have the league's third easiest remaining schedule, but as of last night they also have this: the launch of the "Mavericks FAIL" Campaign. That's some heady stuff, if you ask me. It's not just a kind of hopeful bashing, but a full on karmic propaganda machine. I've actually been pulling for the Mavs all season long, but how can you not want the Suns in the playoffs? Over at the campaign site, they write about a belief in positivity but a subsequent abandonment in the wake of that positivity's failure this season. Thus, they lay out a complete campaign plan, replete with What the Campaign Promises, How You Can Get Involved, You Might Be a Mavericks Fan If, and a flashy logo. Good stuff. Kudos all around, Phoenix players and fan karma team. Here's to you!

By snagamat with No comments

Manu Makes Best of Kiss Cam Opportunity



Everyone's familiar with the old kiss cam. Usually you get cute couples giving each other quick pecks. Manu Ginobili, on the other hand, took the occasion to manhandle fellow Spur in civies Ian Mahinmi. Ginobli wasn't gonna let that bum ankle keep him from maximizing the moment.

Apparently Manu's making somewhat of a habit of this. He even managed an appearance during the Spurs' game in Atlanta last night, despite playing in this one. Word is Bruce Bowen was the happy recipient of Manu's patented man-hand kiss. Spurs are 2-0 in games when Manu's on the kiss cam. Imua Manu! (In Hawaiian that's "Onward, Bird!")

(Courtesy of SpursTalk)

By snagamat with No comments

March 25, 2009

With Somethin' Crazy on My Arm

"Comin' in the club with that fresh shit on, with something crazy on my arm. Uh-uh-um. Now here's another hit, Barry Bonds!" -Kanye

We have every reason to hate (read: jealously covet) the life and style of professional athletes. From the cribs to the rims, the benjies to the gyms. But, and this runs the risk of sounding both sexist and celeb gossip-ist, we all know what exhibits A and B are for why life is unfair: Adriana Lima and Eva Longoria. In similar vein, sports fans everywhere can now drool over one more athlete's arm piece (and these girls are athletes in their own right): it just came out that Jason Kidd's girlfriend Hope Dworaczyk will pose for Playboy.

"Oh my God. She's so hot. She's so hot she's making me sexist. Bitch." - Flight of the Conchords

In other news, however, we sports fans are given pause in our unremitting live-vicarious-through-our-idols agendas (Barash can bash me all he wants). You remember Kobe's wife Vanessa? You know, the one who came out as the victim in that whole Colorado ruckus. Turns out she's quite the shrew. She (and Kobe) is being sued by a former housekeeper for "among other things, sticking her hand in a bag of dog feces to retrieve a price tag." I mean, just a glitteringly pleasant person by all accounts. This, however, brings to light a whole new side of Kobe. He's perhaps the quirkiest superstar ever (see: commercial below), and we know he hates that dog poop. We also know he's a smart guy, always immaculate, always polished in speech to the point of being clipped and sometimes taciturn. So, he's an enigma. That's not new knowledge. But how does such an enigma deal with such a cliche as a spoiled, wannabe diva for a wife? Can you imagine what a reality TV show would be like with that family? It gives me new sympathy for Kobe, and every star athlete who has a wife that thinks money is an excuse to act like a total...well, you know where I'm going with that.


"Find harmony in the key of in your face." Indeed.

By snagamat with No comments

Gotta Love a Gimmick - Shark Boy and Curry Man

I don't know much about TNA wrestling. I do know that a japanese guy who dances around in a crazy mask and a golden hat teaming up with a dude with a stupid mask who acts like Stone Cold Steve Austin is the recipe for an awesome team of gimmicks.

Another great video of the Shark is found here, where he's bed ridden after an accident with his "family" crying around him.

By SpastikMooss with No comments

Today's Moment of Zen: Joe Namath, eat your heart out



In Today's Moment of Zen, remember that time Joe Namath asked Suzy Kolber for a kiss on the lips. Well, she declined and possibly created with that moment "Kissing Suzy Kolber."

Well, father of the Houston Astros announcer Jim Deshales, Herb decided to pull the same stunt with an attractive female reporter.

Herb actually got the kiss. Good for Herb, I guess he still has it.

(Courtesy of Awful Announcing)

By Ben Chew with No comments

March 24, 2009

The Call Out: Tayshaun Prince

The Call Out is a sporadic cross section taken from the pulsing vein of the sports world. When the heartbeat skips, we look at why.

There are a lot of underachievers and goats (not the kind with the periods in between) in tonight's pitiful pairing of the Pistons and Bulls. A lot to not like. One of these TNT games is not like the other, eh boys? But in the end, there's only one participant deserving of tonight's (and the first ever) call out. Is it Tyrus Thomas? The Bulls almost got KG, they almost got Pau, they even drafted Lamarcus Aldridge and signed Ben Wallace, but all they have in the post to show for the last three years (the three years since they swept the Miami Heat) is Thomas and Joakim Noah. Speaking of Noah, he's looked decent of late, but isn't the emotional leader of two championship Gators teams drafted 9th supposed to account for more than a lot of hair? But forget the Bulls. They're a sad testament to how even the best of fanbases can be summarily shat upon (here's looking at you too, Sacramento). They're also exhibit A in the case against using stop-gaps to keep your team competitive but not for a championship. Ben Wallace? Scott Skiles? You know you're going to be making the playoffs with those guys just as much as you know you're going to flame out and need to rebuild in two years.

But forget the Bulls (and Vinny Del Negro, if you can). Look at the pitiful state of the once proud Pistons franchise. Tonight they started Aaron Aflalo and Kwame Brown for crying out loud! Don't get me started on Kwame. Please do get me started on Michael Curry and Allen Iverson's "bad" back. I had such high hopes for Curry coming in to the season. Hand picked by the flawless Joe Dumars. Single-handedly saving a season (I forget which one) from lockout. Leaping tall buildings in a...well, you get the hyperbolic idea. But he hasn't been able to do anything with this team. Iverson's back? Just a weak turn towards Samsonism by the Answer. But I'm not here merely to dog on guys. Or teams. There's a lot to be happy about even in this kind of game. Like Rodney Stuckey Will Bynum. The point is there are reasons for games and whole seasons lacking the kind of luster that gets us fans going. These are two teams fighting for their postseason lives. They should be scratching and sniffing at each like cats in heat. Or something. Instead, it's a game of whiffs. Airball after airball. Dropped passes. "Saving" taps over players' own heads that more often than not volley out of bounds. And the culprit? Who's to blame for all of this? Tayshaun Prince. I'm calling you out!

When I used to rip on the Pistons for being overrated (their one championship came at the expense of my Lakers, what do you expect?), I would always pick on Chauncey Billups. Obviously, I was wrong with that one. But Tayshaun? I'm not going to call him underrated or overrated, because at this point that's more played out than the Kobe vs. Lebron debate. What I will do, however, is spout you a bit of potential and then tell you what we know seven seasons in.

Tayshaun was and has been the poster boy for "doing it right." He came out of Kentucky after four years, a few "blistering" performances, and the usual conference awards (SEC MVP). He didn't start that first year out of Kentucky, coming off the bench behind Clifford Robinson and (hold the phone!) Michael Curry, but he did come on strong in the playoffs. That postseason, he became the only NBA player ever to score more points in the playoffs than in the regular season. Such an emergence, went the rationale, made the possibility of drafting Carmello unimportant to Dumars' '03 eternal sunshine and spotless mind. In '03-'04, Detroit won the NBA finals and the rest, as they say, is history. They won doing it "the right way," with no certifiable star and lots of guys who looked like glue. The ultimate glue guy on that glueiest of teams? Tayshaun. He did it all. Solid game at mid-range, long, and even post play. Moved the ball well. Defensive stopper. Length like no one's business. Pulled down a good number of caroms. Blocked Reggie Miller lay-ups for breakfast. He wouldn't score 30, but if you needed him to he'd put the chairs on the tables before you closed down for the night.

What next for the Prince of the Palace? Better stats. All-Defensive Second teams and Most Improved Player votes. A spot on the Redeem Team. Not bad right? Wrong. Tayshaun was supposed to be the harbinger of the next generation. All this talk of revolutionizing positions? The new forward bearing the KG-Dirk comparisons? Tayshaun was supposed to fulfill that. Look at the list of skills. Sounds pretty good. Or that Olympic team bid. Shane Battier was on that team for similar reasons, and Battier's game has recently been elevated to a whole new level or respect. But Battier's always had that kind of intelligent flare to his game. Here's the thing about a glue guy in the Tayshaun mold, they never break free. KG, like Tayshaun, has been accused of not having that killer instinct, that come-through in the clutch. Karl Malone had that problem too. But these guys, legendary forwards, they may lack the last minute heroics that guards like Kobe and MJ bear (that's another story), but at least they're intense. Tayshaun? Not so much.

Now let's not get carried away. The Pistons don't suck. They haven't sucked for a long time. But they haven't etched their names onto the echelons of history either. Tayshaun looks as if this will be his legacy too. And it didn't have to be that way. The Pistons slowly got rid of a host of the elements that took them to that single title, and at each point of attrition, I thought, "Here's Tayshaun's chance! This is his season! He's going to go Vesuvial on their Pompeii asses!" Alas, it doesn't look like he's erupting any time soon. Half way through a career, it looks like the window's staying open and Prince is staying perpetually on the same side of it. Looking at the boxscore tonight, you might think Prince held it down on a inevitably sinking ship. But what good is a glue guy when everything's falling apart? There's a reason we here go Outside the Boxscore. Prince may look like he's putting up a fine effort, but really he's taking these expressions and normalizing them. Holding it down? Yes, he's holding his team down. Killing it? Yes, he killed it tonight. Yes, he's a bad mother-shut-your-mouth. And by bad, we don't mean good.

Tayshaun? You could've done better. You should be doing better. Tayshaun, you've been called out.

By snagamat with 3 comments

FIELD TRIP! – Pro Football Hall of Fame

FIELD TRIP! is hopefully another regular aspect that we at Outside the Boxscore will try to work into the blog. Any time we go somewhere cool and sports related we’ll try to write a little something and post some pictures. Granted it won’t be a wicked regular segment, but time to time it might pop up.


Anyways, yesterday me and Mr. Chew ambled over to Canton, Ohio to see the Football Hall of Fame. We had both been there before and so it wasn’t an entirely new experience, but there are a bunch of things that were either new or only really struck me this time, and so I thought I’d discuss them here.


First of all, I have to throw up the obligatory Dick Butkus pictures. He didn't make it into the Great Sports Name Hall of Fame, but he certainly was one of the most talented NFL linebackers to ever play the sport. To the left is the lovely bust of this beast of a man, truly showing off his awesome glory. Next to the intro for this post is part of an exhibit that showcased his helmet and a clickable button that told you about how beastly Butkus truly was. However all that talk kind of distracted you from the important point that Dick Butkus was indeed the man and that he did, indeed, play angry. And so I snapped a picture of the important part and moved on.


The second thing about the Hall that really struck me, and which I had noticed before, but not quite so in such a pronounced fashion, was that it is filled with some ridiculous things. Like it’s one thing to have guys like Gus Frerotte and Alex Smith get in the Hall for random achievements. But some of the exhibits are just plain random. My favorite has got to be the one that shows that Emmitt Smith broke the old rushing records of Walter Payton and Jim Brown. Only they can’t just settle with a jersey and a plaque. They have to actually have an entirely white painted nondescript football player (why they went cheap here when most of the other guys in the Hall are fully depicted I don’t know) at the end of a long stretch with 2 broken planes of glass (plastic) in his wake. Glass (more plastic) shards on the ground to add to the effect. The record is great and all, but the display is absolutely ridiculous.


It gets better. Check out the team area where there’s a board explaining the history of each of the NFL’s 32 teams complete with a helmet for each team. Behind the writing of each board is the picture of a player who is representative of the franchise. The Texans have Andre Johnson, the Broncos have John Elway, makes sense. The Falcons, however, have DeAngelo Hall. The same guy who complained his way out of Atlanta and forced Arthur Blank’s hand so that he had to trade him to the Raiders is the pictured athlete for the entire Falcon franchise. Now I get that Michael Vick was probably there before and that they had to replace him with someone. But not all the players are current, couldn’t they have put Jamal Anderson or someone there instead? I know I’m being picky, but this one stuck with me all day.


Another great piece is the GameDay Stadium Theater, where they show you a video about the NFL, training camp through super bowl. Halfway through the showing, the entire area of seats does a 180 just to switch video screens/put you near an exit, which I knew was coming but still totally jumped a bit. The video itself is interesting, not so much for the “behind the scenes” action but more for the players who you see a lot of in it. There’s a ton of Ryan Leaf, some early Colts/Vikings action of Peyton Manning and Randy Moss, and a helluva lot of Cris Carter and Jerome Bettis. My favorite part (well besides the amazingly obscure Amp Lee plunging for a touchdown)? At one point Broncos Coach Mike Shanahan takes a WR aside in training camp and explains to him that he could be a great player in this league one day but that he’s got to make all the catches. The player? Sir Mawn Wilson, who played one year with the Broncos and bounced around a few practice squads before he left the league and played some Arena Football. Guess he never quite learned everything Shanahan had to teach, but at least he’s (sort of) in the Football Hall of Fame.


This all being said, there are some really cool artifacts within the Football Hall of Fame. One of my biggest favorites was the impressive collections cleats they have, especially the personalized ones. I didn’t get a good picture of Eric Dickerson’s cleats, which I thought were pretty snazzy and read "First Down." However, I did get a picture of Morten Andersen's absurd cleats. They're in the Hall for Andersen's consecutive games record as a kicker, and they read "Strength" on the side (as you can see). Dickerson’s had words too, but they were real small and in yellow and sort of awesome. Andersen's I was much less impressed by. Sure I guess a kicker needs leg strength for long field goals into the wind, but when I picture Morten Andersen as a 42 year old late in his career, I don't really see strength. I mean the guy ended up having a FG maximum distance of like 42 yards by the end of his career.


Another great exhibit? This random area where there are life size statues of eight to nine random great players on the left and a bunch of jerseys with audio on the right. When I say random I mean random, it’s like Reggie White and Johnny Unitas and Anthony Munoz and Chuck Noll and a few others, with nothing connecting them/explaining why they specifically were chosen. My favorite of all these players was Walter “Sweetness” Payton, who is kind of chilling in the middle of it all with his trademark headband. I also thought it was kind of weird that he and the others had all this stuff on but no cleats, but I guess they just didn’t donate cleats to the Hall or something. Although Sweetness DID have cleats on display in the same case that Eric Dickerson did, so who knows since, after all, the Hall is freaking weird.


Lastly, no trip to anywhere is complete without a gift shop stop. We spent $0 in the gift shop, but had a good time browsing. Awesome items included foam Eagle Heads and Cowboy Hats, Bears Cedric Benson figures on clearance, and these stand up 2D figures of players past and present. I took pictures of a bunch of these, including Derek Anderson, Mike Ditka, and Dick Butkus (of course), but the best had to be Terrell Owens. I mean he wasn’t even in the same area as the other available stand ups, he was standing on a clearance table all by himself (even though he wasn’t on clearance). Figures TO would have to make a spectacle of himself, even in a HOF gift shop.


That does it for the cool stuff we saw/things I thought about them. Other interesting tidbits include the following:

- TGI Friday’s has great mozzarella sticks

- Me and Ben had a Madden-off. He won in a high scoring affair by 17 pts, but not before I returned a kickoff for a TD with DeSean Jackson with a bunch of 8 year olds cheering me on.

- Me and Ben also has a QB challenge in the throwing cage. Results were unimpressive, but Ben won. Suffice it to say, I’m more of a TE/WR type.

- If you ever go yourself, pick O.J. Simpson’s nose. A friend of mine does it every time she goes (she’s from Canton). Sadly we were unable to because security was all over the Hall of Busts. But that’s the way the cookie crumbles.


Anyways, that was our trip to the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Hope you liked reading about it half as much as we liked visiting it.

By SpastikMooss with No comments

Epochrypha: Trees Don't Fell the Forest

A special Monday edition of Epochrypha, just because...

A quibble, before I get into the real meat of this. In a recent interview, Kobe talked about the “fourth wall” of sports (okay, neither he nor the interviewer said fourth wall, but think about it that way from this point forth please) and how the fan’s experience or at least knowledge of the athletes’ experiences has become that much wider, that much more pervasive, that much more “real.” When I heard this, the first thing I thought was bullshit. Bullshit, because it’s just like an all-access pass to a rock show. You don’t get to see the cocaine and groupies backstage. No, you get the watered down version. So when this all-access pass gets closer and closer to 24/7, that means what happens during the “behind the scenes” that is not actually behind the scenes becomes that much less real. In essence, if you open up the world of the athlete to perpetual viewing, you stop getting the Charles Barkleys and Guns N’ Roses of the world and you get a lot more of the Jonas Brothers or the Donnie and Marie show. This is what I was talking about when I said I was sick of these consumer conscious athletes.

So, following FreeDarko's twitter account, I read this article by David Barash talking about the folly of watching sports. Incensed, I dashed off an entire piece in response, and now I’m kinda sorry. Barash doesn’t even really deserve a response. His posturings are so juvenile. At one point, he spouts some terribly inaccurate evolutionary theory, saying “women are inclined to exaggerate the redness of their lips, the lushness of their hair, or the size of their breasts, in efforts to enhance their appeal to men.” He says this elicits a “larger-than-ordinary” response, as a means to segue into talking about susceptibility to “the blandishments of large groups.” I mean, it’s just all wrong. It doesn’t account for the evolutionary reasons for large breasts (more milk? well, recent research suggests there was actually water-dwelling ramifications to breasts, since largeness wouldn’t seem to be an evolutionary assist when dealing with upright survival), nor does it account for trends towards slimness and subtlety (see: geek chic). It also gets the whole point of March Madness wrong. Most of the people who watch aren’t rooting for the home team; they’re rooting for their brackets, their predictions. People watch March Madness for the upsets and the Cinderella stories, which totally discounts what Barash is trying to do. Furthermore, he warns against the danger of group-think in its relevance to genocide. C’mon! The point of sport is take that kind of energy and channel it into positive arenas. The point is to take battle and make it civilized. Seeing all this now, I wish I hadn’t written the whole damn thing below in response to him, but I’m going to leave it since I like a bunch of the ideas.

Barash asks why people “feel that the athletic exertions of total strangers are somehow consequential for themselves?” Let me ask you this: why do people feel the intellectual exertions of total strangers are somehow consequential for themselves? No self-respecting (or should I say self-protecting, self-serving, self-submitting?) individual would bother asking that question about why people read books. Except high school students. Teenagers often level the best criticism at a society they are able to somewhat remove themselves from. And in this case, I think it’s a legitimate concern. But let me answer the questions of both Barash and high school students everywhere. Why do we watch sports, read books, spectate upon the life of strangers, dip into the voyeuristic? Because this is how we grow, how we expand our worlds, reach to understand those experiences we are not talented or gifted enough to reach ourselves. Because we appreciate those who can go further, and we unashamedly follow after them in the hopes that they can show us more than we could ever otherwise see.

In his article, Barash offers a list of things we might be better off doing instead of watching a sporting event. He suggests “reading a book, talking with your family, going for a walk, wrestling with the dog, listening to some music, smelling a flower, making love.” Problem with that statement is half those things are spectator events too. I’m not going to argue with spending quality time with your family or dog, and I’m certainly not going to argue with making love. I think most people would agree that if we could just do those three things in life, we might be better off. But you know as well as I that this world doesn’t come close to that of wouldn’t-it-be-nices. I offer the reasons that come from negativity because those are easier to understand for those who are not familiar with the positive aspects of watching sports. Look, sometimes you have a bad day. You’re in a foul mood. You’re feeling low, maybe even so low that you don’t really feel worthy of your family, maybe so foul that trying to make love or even be cheered up by one you love would only make you feel worse. Going for a walk is nice, but what about those times when you feel too defeated to even do that? In those cases, I can’t see the wrong in turning to some achievement of someone or something else to cheer you up or console you. Reading a book I’ve already covered. Listening to music is the same. You’re listening to someone else’s masterpiece. That’s just watching with another of your senses, Holmes. Smelling a flower? That’s not your achievement, that’s the flower’s. Even spending time the family dog, it’s old Rover’s achievement that he can always cheer you up. It’s not yours. Oh yeah, and Barash thousands of people cramming into arenas, but what about the stat that says museums around the country average more visitors than do sporting arenas? No one finds time to criticize reading, listening to music, going to a museum, or smelling a flower. Why attack the act of watching sports? I suspect it’s mostly because of the cash cow aspect of March Madness. Don’t blame that on the rabidity of the fans. Blame it on the people who run manage the madness.

I think Barash also mistakes fame for glory. There’s a difference between wanting to be a rock or movie star and wanting to be a sports star. The desire in wanting to be the best athlete in the world is not about wanting to be famous. It’s about wanting to be victorious. It’s not about wanting to be known. It’s about wanting to be remembered.

There’s something else going on here that Barash doesn’t take in to account. Sports are often used as an excuse for two certifiable opiates for the masses (his opening criticism of sports watching): alcohol and television. When we talk about industrial revolutions and technological advances, long term events with widespread consequences especially seen in workplaces, these things take a large socio-emotional toll on the great majority of people who do the legwork. This idea comes from Clay Shirky saying some really smart things about how gin got people through the industrial revolution and how tv has done that for people in recent years. A kind of opiate (to use Barash's word) that we needed before we could learn to move beyond it. (Shirky goes on to talk about civic surplus and how it's being realized now through huge projects done by many people, such as Wikipedia. The whole piece is worth a look, a spectate.) But look, sports is not meant to be that. It is an outlet, for sure, but it’s also an allegiance. In a increasingly globalized world, it’s harder and harder to find local, relatable things to tie oneself to. It’s hard to find an emotional anchor outside the so often breakable family unit. (And why is that family unit so breakable? Because it’s asked to stand alone when really it’s supposed to function within a larger community unit, but I digress) Furthermore, rites of passage have all but disappeared from our society. The closest is graduation, but it has so little meaning. It is no longer a recognition of excellence and accepted preparedness for a world of social responsibilities. Rather, it is a casting off of young people untested in anything but test taking abilities. It’s society saying, “Go. Try. Fail. And then try again. Maybe go to college. That’ll postpone your necessary inclusion into the sad social reality of the working world.” It’s a damaging system. Sports is one of the last vestiges of true social rites, and as such also one of the last bastions of the allegiances/responsibilities these rites usually promote one to. I’m not saying sports is perfect or that it should be seen as the only redeeming facet of a quickly eroding societal structure. Far from that. Rather, I see it as getting some things right. I see it as a model which other professions or sectors of society might examine.

Of course, it’s not without corruption. This generally happens on the money side of things, which I don’t think Barash is tackling and which I shall also steer away from. People who know more and have had more time to mull it over have been over that (link?). What I do want to address is the fan side of things, the people who are not professional athletes, because I think they’re the most important part of the equation. Barash says the very things I’m talking about above are what make sports fanship insidious. He says fans, and youth in particular, are susceptible to the desire for identification with a hero and for the inclusion in a community. I say, what’s wrong with that? It’s not sports’ fault that society has failed to offer up alternatives. Barkley told the world he wasn’t a role model, and yet in some circles he’s becoming one. That’s beside the point. Barash takes athletes to task for not being more admirable role models, and he laments the inculcation of today’s youth into the kind of society that struts its “alcoholics, misogynists, sociopaths, and violence-prone dimwits and miscreants.” (He also says small wonder since they’re adults playing children’s games. Where does he think children’s games come from?) He offers some exemplars he’d like children to emulate, like Einstein and Gandhi. Last I heard, Einstein wasn’t big on hygiene, and Gandhi, cool dude that he was, seemed to like to get in bed with an awful lot of young people. My point is not that there is no one to emulate. It’s just that we shouldn’t look to anyone to be perfect, but rather look at the good things they do and try to take those things into our own spheres of experience. Toting role models as perfect people just makes for untenable expectations and disappointment. Let’s look at all role models as real, fallible people who do some great things.

Look, at it’s most elemental, sports boils down to a civilized form of gladiatorial competition. Prized athletes destroying themselves and each other for the amusement of the masses. (Take that sentence without a grain of irony, and I think you have exactly what Barash is afraid of. But read on, it’s simply not that simple.) What sport better exemplifies this than “professional” wrestling? When I first thought of writing this piece, it was not in response to an article in The Chronicle, but rather in response to The Wrestler and Mickey Rourke’s incredible performance. It’s a sad, beautiful, poignant film and I suggest you see it if you haven’t. It’s all these things, but it works because it’s also equal parts gruesomely gory and drably grey. The stark reality between the wrestler’s real life and that which is glorified under flood lights and the chants of rabid fans. The scary reality presented by the movie (semi-spoiler alert…but the ending’s really achieved by the viewing, not the knowing) is that this athlete is killing himself, literally killing himself just for the glory and seemingly for the adulation of his fans. I mean, its elegiac nature makes it poetic, of course. But taking industrial strength staples in the back just to make for a better show? There’s nothing poetic about that.

Okay, so look. After watching that movie, I asked myself exactly the questions Barash is asking. Only I have a lifetime of appreciation with which to shore up my answers and to keep me from upending the glass, pouring out all the contents, and declaring it bereft and void of meaning. I asked myself: What does an athlete get out of this kind of adulation, and what does an athlete get out of making life a competition? Certainly it doesn’t make him or her a more well adjusted individual. And: Is it really morally sound for fans to cheer these athletes on? Can we not be held culpable for the physical and emotional damage they might be doing to themselves, and shouldn’t we be a little more self-reflective in our role in this whole gig? I mean, sometimes it really does feel like I’m mooing along with all the other sheep. Kobe this. Lebron that. Phelps up to bat. Who cares? But more importantly, why do we care?


It’s not for nothing. Here’s the point of appreciation. It’s not like these people we’re watching are strangers. Okay, we don’t eat dinner with them. We don’t know what they do or think in their spare time (at least, we didn’t). But this is what we do know. We know the game. And, honestly, no matter what the non-appreciators may say, we know why they play. We know why MJ cradled that ball in tears in ’96. We know the things we do to get through pain or to overcome doubt or to exult in the face of all life’s myriad grayness. We know how to fight for one inviolable outcome that can define us beyond any words, any amount of money, any acceptance or rejection. And we know how to fight for that outcome even when it more often than not comes out as a loss for us. Because we know how it feels to try. Because we are human. Because they are human. That is why. We know because we too have shot that ball until our arms wouldn’t lift, until the lines and dimples smoothed away from the constant feel against our fingers and palms, until the blacktop cracked underneath our perpetual shot at momentary glory. We know because we have had dads keep us in the batting cage until our hands bled, because we have had mothers who haven’t let us sleep with our glove, because we have had coaches who made us do a thousand push-ups, a million wind-sprints, get some water and then do it again. We know because we’ve had teachers who didn’t believe in us, and we’ve had those who did. We know because no matter how fast we go (or how relatively slow), still we know what it feels like to run until the air burns in your lungs and you’re not sure what the difference is between pain and fun. We know because we know what it feels like at the end of a day. That’s how we know, and that’s why we watch them play.

By snagamat with No comments

Field Trip Story to Come, Mike Fontenot Really Freaking Weird

First things first. Today Outside the Boxscore took a Field Trip to the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Once I get all of the pictures uploaded to my computer there will be a post about our trip. Probably coming a little later today.

Secondly, I was reading some Yahoo Fantasy Info from Brad Evans and found out some very interesting stuff about Mike Fontenot of the Cubs regarding Carlos Zambrano and pre game rituals. Apparently before every game last year Zambrano would pretend to hammer a nail in Fontenot's head. And then somewhere in the season Zambrano began following that up with a piggy back around the dugout for Fontenot. When asked about it, Fontenot said, "I really can't remember where we got it from. It's just driving a nail into the ground, and then we implemented a thing where I jump on his back and he carries me to the promised land." Gotta love the wackiness, and I hope it keeps going this year too, maybe with some bat spinning added in.

By SpastikMooss with No comments

March 23, 2009

Today's Moment of Zen: Peyton Manning sings with Kenny Chesney



In Today's Moment of Zen, Indianapolis Colts quarterback Peyton Manning was caught singing with country music star Kenny Chesney at Sloppy Joe's in Key West, Florida.

Honestly, I really do not know what to say about this video but why do I have some sinking suspicion that he will get another endorsement deal from this.

(Courtesy of TMZ.com)

By Ben Chew with No comments

Epochrypha: Outside the Bracketology

In bi-weekly installments, OtB brings you a long-form joint re: NBA and its ontological extension unto all of sport. Epochrypha: writings or statements of questionable authorship or authenticity, but always impassioned and always with an eye on the times we're spectating in. Enjoy.

First off, I'd like to take credit for the ingenious new NBDL play-off scheme. See, almost a year ago I e-mailed Truehoop's Henry Abbott with an idea very similar to what they're doing. If you haven't been looking under rocks for NBDL news, what they're doing is letting the three division winners pick their first round opponents. Now, I came up with this idea a year ago not in response to the too long NBA season or the stagnantion caused by too obvious outcomes/too few upsets/7 game first round series but rather in response to last year's discussions about conference discrepancy. We all know how that discrepancy played out, though. The 50 win Nuggets put up much less of a fight than did the 37 win Hawks, and that argument hasn't been brought back up again, especially with a lot of teams in the East looking much better than their records suggest. Anyway, the discussion revolved around seeding teams regardless of conference. I suggested allowing the top teams the privilege of choosing their first-round opponents as a way to get around geographical difficulties. If you're a Florida team do you really want to play Denver or Portland in a 7 game series regardless of how well you match up? So let the best teams choose. It'd be like draft day, with a count down to decisions and war-room set ups and everything.

I'm not saying this is the best idea or that the NBA should necessarily implement it, but I do think playoff structures in general should be thoroughly examined and perhaps reconstituted. It being March Madness and all, we would be remiss in leaving The Tournament out of our discussion. The Big Dance is probably one of the biggest money makers in all of sports, especially accounting for its relative brevity and the fact that its players don't actually require a significant cut of the profits (recently debated). I don't have the numbers to back this up, but c'mon, everyone knows the NCAA is sports' cash cow, the sacrificial lamb, the Isaac to "pro" sports' Ishmael. What makes it so exciting? To fun to watch? So endlessly begging for prediction and wagering and heartbreak/bolster? It's the one-and-done format. We love it, but who would accept that for a pro sports league? Oh wait, that would be the NFL.

I'm not going to rag on USA's favorite three letter excuse to get drunk and yell (hey, this isn't the first stone). However, when comparing sports the NFL's penchant for upsets and parity is always brought up as one of the reasons for its intense popularity. I've always got the sense this was both a good and bad thing. Parity makes for a lot of excitement within the moment, but what about long term potential? Perhaps this is where I show my sport homerism and side with basketball, but I think one of the great things about the NBA is the potential for the creation of histories, story lines that extend beyond players' careers. The perfect example was on show last June when the Celts and Lakers suited up for the finals. In what other sport would that be a rivalry when none of the players had battled against each other while with their respective current teams? It doesn't happen in other sports because parity is the antithesis to dynasty. Okay, but back to the NFL. You can't rag on these guys for playing less games than other athletes. They're killing themselves out there, and everyone knows it. It's the closest thing we have to Roman gladiators. Scratch that, the second closest thing. But the lack of games brings up another salient point.

There was an article a few months ago comparing sports attendance and musem attendance, and museums were higher by a landslide. Why? Because you can't see the famous paintings online. Well, maybe one or two really famous ones, but those are just the highlights. If you want to see that Matisse you've heard so much about, you have to go down to the museum and actually see it. Because they don't put it on TV for you, and they carefully guard it from spreading across the internet. They decrease supply to raise demand. Don't get me wrong, I don't ever want sports taken from TV. Having these epic battles broadcast straight into my living room is part of the genius of modern sports. But the point is that with football less is more.

With baseball? Not so much. The national pasttime has never been about the games, and it's a pity. MLB players are artists. They perfect their skills so meticulously. They are neither the raw, wrecking-ball forces of nature you see in football or the smooth synthesis of athleticism and style in basketball. Rather, one might dub them the supreme stylists. And in this they pattern themselves most after the industrial working world, where specialities become one's calling card. Who needs a complete player when you can pull in a pinch hitter? But it's that workman-like dedication to specialities that creates the MLB atmosphere of nonchalance. MLB season ain't a track meet, it's a marathon. Okay, I know the World Series is a big deal, especially with the reason cancellation of Olympics competition...but, honestly, I can't tell if baseball fans care more about the World Series or the race to the pennant. I've never been to a baseball park, but I hear it's all about being there, catching foul balls (that don't matter to the actual game), getting hot dogs, y'know the works. The idea, then, is that you're so inundated that you can't stop inundating yourself. We're immersed in baseball, even though it's probably behind football as America's favorite sport by a long distance. I swear half of sportscenter is baseball during the season, and it drives me crazy. What do I have to say about their postseason structures? Not much. They remind of the NBA's, except because of the nature of baseball, 7-game series are not really as grueling. It's crazy to have such a long season and then such a comparatively short postseason. Or maybe it's crazy to have as long a post-season as the NBA does? Yeah, that's more like it. There's also something to be said about the wild card element in both these sports, but I'm not sure I'm the one to say it.



Back to the NBA. No one will disagree that there's something rotten about the whole season and post-season's structure. There are moments of absolute magic. Underneath March Madness are developing the playoff races that are going to matter in April. But there are definitely doldrums that lurk every season. After the bloom is off the first round rose, people quickly lose interest. Even some near die hard fans only watch four or five out of a series that goes seven. And then it's just a wait-and-watch-sportscenter game until June. January and part of February are like that in the NBA too. Fans know that, and you just maintain interest enough to be informed when you start to care again. But it doesn't have to be this way. One of the suggestions that's been batted around is less games, or even less teams. This would achieve the lower supply higher demand model we see in football, but would it really be a solution? It just decreases the problem, it doesn't make it go away. What we really want is an NBA season where all the games matter. Where we don't get lost in what does 30 wins in December translate to down the road games. The other proposition I've seen is based on a Euroleague soccer model, one I'm not that familiar with but that sounds great. The idea is to have a bunch of different tournaments during the season. This way you can incorporate different groupings of teams and see different dynamics come out. Mark Cuban even mentioned the idea of bringing in teams from over seas. I'd propose a thirty game seeding "season" and then maybe three tournaments with options like challenge exhibition games between tournaments that would affect the next round of seeding. I think it could be a lot of fun. I'd go into specific examples, but I think I've spun off enough words here already.

One last thought. This kind of tournament model could mean the NBA could play a host of different venues. Maybe home court would be a huge part of it. Or you could take games to cities without teams. What this would look like is "pro" wrestling, which I sometimes think the "big" sports could learn from in terms of endorsing story lines (see: you can't argue how much wrestling is like ancient Roman blood sport, can you?). But maybe that's bush league. D-league. Semi-professional/playing for scholarships. I don't know. I can't really get a hold on these sports ethics/aesthetics when they get too macro. But on the ground, talking to growing sports fans, it's kind of amazing how much velocity wrestling gains. I think tournaments could function much like wrestling's pay-per-view events, except bigger and not campy like pay-per-view shit. Anyway.

So what's the ideal system for the NBA? Or for any sport? I think every sport and league has to come up with their own model. It's important for it not to be too complicated, but it shouldn't be too simple either. You want fans arguing deep into the night about what's right and what's wrong with a system. Make it too simple and they have a two minute argument and go home none the wiser. So all this discussion was to increase our wisdom quotient, then? Well, something has to. The good stuff's in the argument, not in the way you walk away from it.

By snagamat with No comments
  • Popular
  • Categories
  • Archives